W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review

From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:52:41 +0100
Message-ID: <4FFD22B9.8030006@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
CC: 'Felix Sasaki' <fsasaki@w3.org>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Yves,
This sound sensible, but you get me thinking, what are the override 
semantics between a domain rule that just specifies a source meta-data 
selector and one that subsequently specifies a mapping, should we 
specify that the consumer tool takes the RHS value of the mapping rather 
than the LHS?

Also, this got me thinking. The selector in the example would select all 
meta data, regardless of whether its useful for translation domains or 
not. Can we specify that more specific meta-data selectors should NOT be 
used as a domain indicator?

Regards,
Dave

On 10/07/2012 13:44, Yves Savourel wrote:
> Hi Felix, Dave, all,
>
> One more question on Domain:
>
> There is no "Default, inheritance, overriding of data category" for Domain:
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#datacategories-defaults-etc
>
> I assume:
>
> - Default is none
> - Inheritance is " Textual content of element, including attributes and child elements"
> - Overriding is Yes
>
> Just like locNote. Is that correct?
>
> Thanks,
> -yves
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:48 AM
> To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [All] domain data category section proposal, please review
>
> Hi Felix, Dave, all,
>
> I'm working on implementing the Domain data category.
> And I have a clarification question:
>
> My understanding is that for the domainMapping attribute, the left part of the pair is unique within the mapping. And several left parts can map to a single right part. Is that correct?
>
> That is, we could have:
>
> domainMapping="automotive auto, medical medicine, 'criminal law' law, 'property law' law"
>
>
> Note for the editors:
>
> By the way, the current definition in the draft is not very specific on which part is in the document and which part is not. I know it's rather logical, but it may be more clear to say so explicitly, rather than just in the example?
>
> Also in "The values may contain spaces; in that case they MUST be delimited by quotation marks." Maybe stating explicitely which characters can be used as quotation marks would be more clear? The example uses single quotes, but I assume double ones are also OK (any other?).
>
> thanks,
> -yves
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 06:53:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:31:47 UTC