W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > July 2012

Re: ACTION-147: Write something for option a) of rdf conversion, plus XSLT

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 18:18:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL58czoJ_cuSXOoDjnSPAMRwN6pMymEuSiC+vAwKKzBNYVtFmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr>
Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Fabien Gandon <fabien.gandon@inria.fr>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Hi Maxime,

2012/7/6 Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr>

> That's a great version,
> OK for the namespace, the actual RDF vocabulary must be accessible at this
> URL, and documented.
>
> I got late for my action 146 but I guess it's no big deal, I'm happy with
> the XSLT transformation you made, and it'll always be possible to propose
> another conversion process.
>

Thanks for the nice feedback - I'll then close the ACTION-146 (we can
re-open it later if you have time to work on it) and create another one,
ACTION-164, due end of July, for you to work on the ITSRDF vocabulary. I
will put the "update of the XSD" as a reminder in that action item.

Both actions relate of course to ISSUE-29 "ITS and RDF".

Best

Felix


> I'll help to write the RDF vocabulary for ITSRDF, and to write the section
> "the ITSRDF vocabulary" in accordingly.
> The xsd document will also need to be updated so that the datatypes exist.
>
> Kind regards,
> Maxime
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *De: *"Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>
> *À: *"Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz>, "Maxime Lefrançois" <
> maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr>, "Fabien Gandon" <fabien.gandon@inria.fr>,
> public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Envoyé: *Vendredi 6 Juillet 2012 00:29:31
> *Objet: *Re: ACTION-147: Write something for option a) of rdf conversion,
> plus XSLT
>
>
> Hi Jirka, Maxime, all,
>
> I implemented the suggestion of Maxime about the datatypes, see attachment
> (for "tranlsate" and "locNoteType"). I did this also for term ("yes" or
> "no") and directionality.
>
> WRT to the namespace, I agree with Jirka. The output now has the namespace
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its/rdf#
>
>
> Would that be OK with everybody?
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> 2012/7/4 Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
>
>> On 3.7.2012 23:40, Maxime Lefrançois wrote:
>>
>> > Another point: shouldn't you define xmlns:its="
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its#" (its:translate resolved as
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its#translate) instead of xmlns:its="
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" (its:translate resolved as
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/11/itstranslate).
>>
>> I think that we shouldn't pollute ITS namespace with RDF and simply use
>> completely different URI for referencing ITS datacategories in RDF.
>>
>> Using something like xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its#" will
>> only confuse people trying to use ITS in just XML context where
>> xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" is appropriate.
>>
>>                                 Jirka
>>
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>        Professional XML consulting and training services
>>   DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Felix Sasaki
> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Sunday, 8 July 2012 16:18:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:31:47 UTC