- From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@inria.fr>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:13:30 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Hi Felix, Nice RDF output ! a few comments: - you might want to specify the datatype of 'yes/no' (its:yesOrNo ?), depending on the resolution of ISSUE-30 https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/30 - to limit the length of the document, maybe invert the order of XSLT pattern (for each node, write its ITS properties) - about rdf:parseType="Literal" (which identifies literals of type rdf:XMLLiteral, c.f., example and n3 output of section http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#section-Syntax-XML-literals ). There might be a new rdf:parseType value tu use for HTMLLiteral. We shall keep an eye on RDF 1.1, as I understand we will need to specify XMLLiteral OR HTMLLiteral depending on the type of document we transform. - For CMS content, it might be useful to define the relative path starting from the element that has a certain id or a certain idValue attribute ? e.g., something like http://example.com/exampledoc.html#xpath(//.[@id=X]/...) or http://example.com/exampledoc.html#xpath(//.[@idValue=X]/...) - Now that we have a XSLT stylesheet based transformation, we may specify the GRDDL profile and register it. A link to this profile SHOULD be added to the output XML file, so that triples may be automatically extracted from it see this short introduction to GRDDL: http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view Kind regards, Maxime Lefrançois ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org> > À: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > Envoyé: Samedi 30 Juin 2012 10:49:03 > Objet: ACTION-147: Write something for option a) of rdf conversion, > plus XSLT > Hi Maxime, all, > I worked on this (not finished yet). Given this input > http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/inputdata/LocNote1.xml > I have generated the attached triples. I decided to go for RDF/XML, > you were right, Maxmime, to propose this. > Note that the output contain both defaults for all data categories, > plus what's actually specified as "global rules" for the > "localization note" data category in > http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/inputdata/LocNote1.xml > Any thoughts, proposals for corrections etc.? > Best, > Felix > -- > Felix Sasaki > DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 12:14:11 UTC