- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:37:40 +0100
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Am 03.12.12 14:33, schrieb Yves Savourel: >> We can't change HTML handling of these values. But we could >> require producers of these values to be lower case, that is: >> ontology-concept >> lexical-concept >> would this solve the problem? I checked >> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/schemas/its20-types.rng >> it seems (see the "value" elements in the schema file) that ontologyConcept and >> lexicalEntity are the only values that would need to be changed. > There are also all the data category identifiers used in annotatorsRef I suppose. Correct. These are all lower cased, see the table at http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#datacategories-overview > > >From an implementation viewpoint it is not a big deal to treat HTML and XML differently I was mostly thinking about the test suite. There is a MUST in that paragraph, so we should have tests to validate all cases where this occurs. > > Keeping things as it is now is OK (a bit annoying, but OK) in my implementer opinion. I think we could easily decide about this during the call today. That is, saying: we will publish the LC draft this the change lexicalConcept > lexical-concept ontologyConcept >ontologyConcept I will add that to the agenda for today. This change is minor, so we could vote for LC publication without an addition review. Best, Felix > Leroy and Dom may have a different view. > > -ys > >
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 13:38:08 UTC