action-205 (Re: action-20x ITS ontology)

Re-sent with the correct action number.

Felix

2012/8/31 Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>

> Hi Maxime,
>
> we didn't make a lot of progress on the ITS ontology and action-164. Hence
> at yesterday's call, we discussed dropping the ontology.
>
> Looking at
>
> http://wiki.nlp2rdf.org/wiki/ITS2NIF2ITS
>
> this would probably influence the ITS to NIF conversion, hence I am
> putting Sebastian into the loop. So it would be better to have the
> ontology, but we are struggling with time resources to create them. So if
> there is a way to do ITS2NIF without the ontology and there is no volunteer
> to create it, we might have to drop it.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>



-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow