Hi Maxime, we didn't make a lot of progress on the ITS ontology and action-164. Hence at yesterday's call, we discussed dropping the ontology. Looking at http://wiki.nlp2rdf.org/wiki/ITS2NIF2ITS this would probably influence the ITS to NIF conversion, hence I am putting Sebastian into the loop. So it would be better to have the ontology, but we are struggling with time resources to create them. So if there is a way to do ITS2NIF without the ontology and there is no volunteer to create it, we might have to drop it. Best, FelixReceived on Friday, 31 August 2012 11:26:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:31:51 UTC