Re: [ACTION-208] Add voting support to Locationzation Quality Précis

Hi Yves, all,

2012/8/30 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>

> Hi all,
>
> I've added the attributes locQualityPrecisVote and
> locQualityPrecisVotePointer to the data category.
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#lqprecis
>
>
> - The name is not great maybe we should have locQualityPrecisVotingScore
> and locQualityPrecisRangeScore but this is getting just too long and
> probably confusing.
>
> - I've adapted an example to show the voting, but a better one are
> certainly welcome.
>
> - Currently we can use either vote or score not both. This allows to share
> the threshold. Hopefully this is fine. Otherwise we may have to also have a
> threshold for the voting.
>
> - We've talked about harmonizing the scores/ranges in general. Currently
> locQualityPrecisScore is an integer between 0 and 100 (inclusive). Should
> we move to a decimal between 0 and 1?
>

Good idea, that fits to yesterday's conclusion

http://www.w3.org/2012/08/30-mlw-lt-irc.html#T15-03-05

Best,

Felix


>
> Cheers,
> -yves
>
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow