- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:14:59 -0600
- To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Hi Des, > This particular segment has 3 translation candidates that > users can vote on. Users can click either the checkbox (+ve vote) > or the ‘x’ (-ve vote). The aggregate of all users’ votes for > each candidate translation represents the ‘quality score’ for > that candidate. So, just to see if I get this right: if, for a given translation, you have 5 'plus' and 12 'minus', your aggregated score will be -7? If that's the case, your system seems to be indeed open-ended and cannot be truly mapped to a range. Therefore I don't think having locQualityPrecisScore as value between -100 and 100 will be more useful than if it's a value between 0 and 100. In both case it wouldn't be interoperable with any of the range-based scores used by other systems. Basically, I think a range-based value can only represent a rating, not a voting system. Maybe we need another attribute altogether that would represent voting? -yves
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 13:15:34 UTC