- From: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 17:12:27 +0100
- To: Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de>
- Cc: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, Multilingual Web LT Public List <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF64D09F43.D1B3E46F-ON80257A53.0058E25F-80257A53.005907D6@vistatec.ie>
I see. In the past I have relied on the assistance of jQuery to parse and add extra classes where necessary. Phil. From: Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de> To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, Cc: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>, Multilingual Web LT Public List <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org> Date: 07/08/2012 15:30 Subject: Re: [ISSUE-34] Problem with mandatory attributes for quality I actually thought about splitting the XYZ:yxz.com/fake into two attributes (locQualityProfileRef and locQualityCode) since it would make such selections easier, but adding another attribute to an already big thing is really not ideal either. -Arle On Aug 7, 2012, at 16:25 , Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: 2012/8/7 Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> I would see a requirement to support multiple annotations per element but only independent ones. That is, Arle's second example would seem required as it allows multiple, independent agents to add markup. For the first example, the parent entity seems redundant. Felix, what would prohibit the application of CSS/DOM processing to the multiple records? The complexity of writing adequate CSS selectors. How would you write a CSS selector that matches <meta its-loc-quality-profile="XYZ:xyz.com/fake" /> with its-loc-quality-code="XYZ:wrong_name" ? Felix ************************************************************ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately by e-mail. www.vistatec.com ************************************************************
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 16:12:57 UTC