- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:53:03 -0600
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: "'Arle Lommel'" <arle.lommel@dfki.de>, "'Multilingual Web LT Public List'" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
> In ITS 1.0 we were very careful not to allow implementations > to say "I implement the localization note data category > globally, and I implement only locNote and locNote ref, but > not locNotePointer or locNoteRefPointer. This is very helpful > for interoperability. If application A (or a human) creates > localization note metadata and sends it to implementation B > that claims "I implement the localization note data category > globally", application A can be sure that all localization > note metadata will be processed by application B. > ... > So the main question is if we agree on above approach? +1 > Now, coming back to quality ... > ... > loc-quality-score: mandatory, value is 0-100 or "unknown" > loc-quality-severity: mandatory, value is "unknown" or what Arle > had in the table "permissive values" Mmm... defaulting to "unknown" for numeric value will cause some minor headaches for some implementations that would store the parsed value as a numeric. I guess they can convert to -1. Another note for score and severity: why do we have one between 0 and 100 and the other between 0.00 and 1.00. It's exactly the same thing just using a different notation. Couldn't we go for 0-100 for both: that way implementation could use shorts to store the values, rather than the more clumsy floats? -ys
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 10:53:32 UTC