Re: [all] Call for consensus on Entity - feedback integrated [ACTION-181]

Apologies -- wrong link on the previous mail. This is the relevant one:
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/181
-- Tadej

On 02. 08. 2012 17:22, Tadej Štajner wrote:
> Hi, all,
> this is the integration of the feedback points from the last call on 
> the Entity data category and subsequently on the mailing list. I 
> cleaned up and defined the terms, so it better fits both use cases, 
> lexical as well as conceptual disambiguation, and introduced XPath 
> variants of the attributes since they were used in the examples, but 
> not defined anywhere.
>
> I'd ask anyone who's interested in taking another look. Otherwise, I 
> think we can move forward.
>
> -- Tadej
>
> Related:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0280.html 
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0288.html 
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/181
>
>
>
> On 26. 07. 2012 15:47, Tadej Štajner wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> (cc-ing additional people who may be interested in this),
>>
>> this may be relevant at today's call. Here's a summary and 
>> integration of what was going on around the named entity and 
>> disambiguation data categories, along with usage in RDFa Lite.
>>
>> -- Tadej
>>
>> Related in https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/ :
>> [ISSUE-2]
>> [ISSUE-18]
>> [ISSUE-29]
>> [ISSUE-35]
>> [ACTION-164]
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 15:27:41 UTC