Re: [all] Call for consensus on Entity - feedback integrated [ISSUE-181]

Hi, all,
this is the integration of the feedback points from the last call on the 
Entity data category and subsequently on the mailing list. I cleaned up 
and defined the terms, so it better fits both use cases, lexical as well 
as conceptual disambiguation, and introduced XPath variants of the 
attributes since they were used in the examples, but not defined anywhere.

I'd ask anyone who's interested in taking another look. Otherwise, I 
think we can move forward.

-- Tadej

Related:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0280.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jul/0288.html
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/181



On 26. 07. 2012 15:47, Tadej Štajner wrote:
> Hi all,
> (cc-ing additional people who may be interested in this),
>
> this may be relevant at today's call. Here's a summary and integration 
> of what was going on around the named entity and disambiguation data 
> categories, along with usage in RDFa Lite.
>
> -- Tadej
>
> Related in https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/ :
> [ISSUE-2]
> [ISSUE-18]
> [ISSUE-29]
> [ISSUE-35]
> [ACTION-164]
>