Re: [ACTION 107] Locale Filter

Good point, Yves, I tried to implement this at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#LocaleFilter

Best,

Felix

2012/8/1 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>

> Hi Felix, Shaun,
>
> I had implemented the version with 'all/none' and I've now changed it to
> the one without 'none/all': From the implementation viewpoint there is no
> measurable difference in complexity.
>
> From a user viewpoint now we always have two attributes, so it is a bit
> more verbose to express all/none, but I suppose it is a bit more clean too.
>
> One detail:
>
> The text says 'The list of language ranges is a comma-separated list of
> basic language ranges, or the wildcard "*"'
>
> But BCP47 defines the 'basic language range' in a way that includes "*":
> 'A "basic language range" has the same syntax as an [RFC3066] language tag
> or is the single character "*".'
>
> So a list of basic language ranges could be localeFilterList="fr,*,de".
>
> If we want to exclude "*" from multi-values lists, we should specify
> something like:
>
> 'The list of language ranges is a comma-separated list of one or more
> language tags as defined in RFC3066 or a lone wildcard "*"' (or something
> of that effect).
>
> Cheers,
> -ys
>
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow