- From: Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:09:17 +0000
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Cc: Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMYWBwsq1+Afj889g390arZwtgMfm0+mKZqHCDw5OUj2nf_P3w@mail.gmail.com>
I think I have the solution to the errors. But I will have to re-do the file. Leroy On 30 January 2013 15:02, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote: > Sorry I had the wrong DOCTYPE in place. I have changed the DOCTYPE to: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" " > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> > > The errors now detected are only ITS based. > > Leroy > > > On 30 January 2013 14:46, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote: > >> One more note: I’m not quite sure the input file is a valid XHTML >> document.**** >> >> it’s detected as an (invalid) HTML5 document with the W3C validator.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> -ys**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* Leroy Finn [mailto:finnle@tcd.ie] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2013 7:22 AM >> *To:* Arle Lommel >> *Cc:* Yves Savourel; <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org> >> >> *Subject:* Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang)**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I have added the output now along with updating the test suite dashboard >> for this new test.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> The input is located here: >> https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/blob/master/its2.0/inputdata/languageinformation/html/languageinfo4html.html >> **** >> >> The output is located here: >> https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/blob/master/its2.0/expected/languageinformation/html/languageinfo4htmloutput.txt >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Let me know if this is okay,**** >> >> Leroy**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On 30 January 2013 13:41, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:**** >> >> Everyone this test file now has been added here: >> https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/blob/master/its2.0/inputdata/languageinformation/html/languageinfo4html.html . >> I will add the output soon. So issue-110 can be closed for Ankit.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Cheers,**** >> >> Leroy**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On 29 January 2013 10:09, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:**** >> >> Okay I will add this test file today based on this discussion.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Leroy**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On 28 January 2013 21:32, Arle Lommel <arle.lommel@dfki.de> wrote:**** >> >> Anything else would be tremendously unintuitive for most users and would >> create strange problems. So +1 to Yves and Shaun. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Arle >> >> --**** >> >> *Arle Lommel***** >> >> Berlin, Germany**** >> >> Skype: arle_lommel**** >> >> Phone (US): +1 707 709 8650**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse any typos.***** >> >> >> On Jan 28, 2013, at 21:21, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:*** >> * >> >> +1 on Shaun's comments. >> (especially "...xml:lang to take precedence over lang only when defined >> on the same node") >> >> -ys >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shaun McCance [mailto:shaunm@gnome.org <shaunm@gnome.org>] >> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 12:28 PM >> To: Felix Sasaki >> Cc: Jirka Kosek; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org >> Subject: Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang)**** >> >> On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 12:17 +0100, Felix Sasaki wrote: >> >> **** >> >> Am 25.01.13 11:19, schrieb Jirka Kosek:**** >> >> On 25.1.2013 9:01, Felix Sasaki wrote:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> we had discussed on Wednesday**** >> >> http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-irc#T11-36-22**** >> >> that xml:lang and lang take precedence over the BCP 47 value **** >> >> conveyed by a "langRule". One clarification question: should we **** >> >> state that this relation also includes inherited values? e.g.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> <html xml:lang="en" ...>...**** >> >> <its:langRule selector="//h:p" langPointer="@class"> ...**** >> >> <body lang="ja"> ...**** >> >> <p class="de">...**** >> >> </html>**** >> >> ** ** >> >> In this case the output of processing "langRule" would convey "en":**** >> >> xml:lang takes precedence over HTML lang. And xml:lang inherits to "p".** >> ** >> >> My instinct says that inheritence shouldn't be applied here and for **** >> >> p element language should be selected using langRule.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Fine by me - so the output in the test suite would be**** >> >> ** ** >> >> /html lang="en"**** >> >> ...**** >> >> /html/body[1] lang="ja"**** >> >> /html/body[1]/p[1] lang="de"**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Now, if "p" contains a "span" element, what would the language be? **** >> >> Probably**** >> >> ** ** >> >> /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1] lang="de"**** >> >> >> I would say certainly lang="de". I would also expect xml:lang to take >> precedence over lang only when defined on the same node, so I would expect >> the language to be "ja" on body. >> >> getLang(node): >> if node/@xml:lang: return node/@xml:lang >> if node/@lang: return node/@lang >> if node selected by a langRule: return value from rule >> if node.parent: return getLang(node.parent) >> else: return "" >> >> Seems to me that's the same algorithm we use for all other data >> categories, except we don't define our own local attribute, using xml:lang >> and lang instead. >> >> -- >> Shaun >> >> >> >> >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 15:09:45 UTC