XML seems okay and so does HTML again feedback is welcome. Leroy On 18 January 2013 15:05, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote: > Okay I have updated the HTML files again both input and output for HTML 2 > (which had an @lang in by mistake as it was an old output file) and HTML 3 > in which i left lang=en in the HTML file by mistake. I will double check > HTML and will check XML now. > > Leroy > > > On 18 January 2013 14:44, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote: > >> Hi Leroy, all, >> >> > About HTML 3 I didn't know we were going to identify lang in >> > the output of the file. So if we are doing this then from my >> > reading of the data category we should have a test in XML >> > example xml:lang which i can add now. >> >> I think the idea is that the output shows whatever ITS result comes from >> the processing, whether it's a global or local rule, a native ITS markup or >> other ones. >> >> The note in >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#language-information shows >> that. >> >> But, and it's an important point, we actually do not have a "MUST" >> statement that says ITS processor must 'see' xml;lang and HTML lang as >> local markup for Language Information (unlike we do for xml:id and id in >> the Id Value data category). maybe we should. >> >> Also the HTML translate attribute has no MUST statement associated with >> the Translate data category. It's not even mentioned other than by an >> example. >> >> cheers, >> -yves >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 15:14:43 UTC