LQI test files

Hi Leroy,

I've noticed the presence of locQualityIssuesRef at the same time as other attributes in several test files.
We can have only either a reference to a standoff markup or directly the information.
So, for example:

<its:rules xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" version="2.0">
  <its:locQualityIssueRule selector="//h:span[@id='q1']"
    locQualityIssuesRef="#l1234" 
    locQualityIssueType="typographical"
    locQualityIssueComment="Sentence without capitalization"/>
  <its:locQualityIssueRule selector="//h:span[@id='q2']"
    locQualityIssuesRef="#l1235" 
    locQualityIssueType="spelling"
    locQualityIssueComment="should be 'Music can'"/>
</its:rules>

should be:

<its:rules xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" version="2.0">
  <its:locQualityIssueRule selector="//h:span[@id='q1']"
    locQualityIssueType="typographical"
    locQualityIssueComment="Sentence without capitalization"/>
  <its:locQualityIssueRule selector="//h:span[@id='q2']"
    locQualityIssueType="spelling"
    locQualityIssueComment="should be 'Music can'"/>
</its:rules>


Do you want us to fix the files when we find error like this?

For some differences there is a need for discussion, but in many cases, when the files have syntax or obvious errors it would probably save time and efforts to have the finder just fix the files and push them to GitHub.

cheers,
-yves

Received on Friday, 23 November 2012 15:44:02 UTC