Re: LQI test files

Hey Yves,

I have these files corrected as i noted these mistakes when i was parsing
them. But as mentioned in the mail I sent last night i have not committed
any new updates to loc quality or precis these shall be in the next update
which will be today hopefully at some stage.

* "corrected data category files and added in new output format for all
> data categories except for ruby,directionality,loc quality and precis and
> disambiguation".  *(quote from mail and github)


Also i agree with you Felix could you make an action item for this so that
people know that they can correct files all except for the
*ruby,directionality,loc
quality and precis and disambiguation *which will be added this evening at
some stage.Thanks for the help guys :)

Thanks,
Leroy

On 19 November 2012 19:52, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:

> Thanks for checking, Yves.
>
> Leroy, Dom, all: I'm sure you will answer this in your update, but just
> asking: it might help to "force" the implementors to do what Yves is doing:
> already starting checking "their" data category files, and also provide
> updates which you just have to commit. It will save you a lot of work, and
> it will make sure that we detect errors soon.
>
> If you agree I'm happy to distribute a lot of action items :)
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> Am 19.11.12 18:02, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>
>  Hi Leroy, Dom, all,
>>
>> looking at some of the test files for Localization Quality Issue, for
>> example:
>> https://github.com/finnle/ITS-**2.0-Testsuite/blob/master/**
>> its2.0/inputdata/**locqualityissue/xml/**locqualityissue1xml.xml<https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/blob/master/its2.0/inputdata/locqualityissue/xml/locqualityissue1xml.xml>
>>
>> It seems there is consistently a use of both the reference to a standoff
>> markup and a local/global markup.
>> But we can't have both on the same node.
>>
>> If we have locQualityIssuesRef the information is in the standoff markup
>> nowhere else.
>>
>> I've also noticed invalid pointers like ".@issueRef" which should be
>> "./@issueRef" or probably even simpler: "@issueRef"
>>
>> But I suppose we'll have to re-work most of the LQI files anyway since we
>> are dropping most pointers there.
>>
>> cheers,
>> -yves
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>