RE: Test Suit Specs - Standoff Markup

+1

 

From: Leroy Finn [mailto:finnle@tcd.ie] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:02 AM
To: Felix Sasaki
Cc: Fredrik Liden; Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
Subject: Re: Test Suit Specs - Standoff Markup

 

I haven't started on localisation quality parsing yet but i would go with the pattern of alphabetical ordering. What do others think?

Leroy

On 12 November 2012 10:01, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:

I haven't start on localisation quality parsing yet but i would go with the pattern of alphabetical ordering. What do others think?

Leroy

 

On 10 November 2012 05:03, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:

+1. Would it make sense to say in the test suite description that the elements inside standoff markup are ordered alphabetically? 

- Felix

 

2012/11/9 Fredrik Liden <fliden@enlaso.com>

I think testoutput for standoff markup is undefined, especially for multiple entries applied to the same target.

 

In case Leroy needs some feedback maybe you  can think about how to best represent the test output of this test file, Example 84:

 

<?xml version="1.0"?>

<xliff version="1.2" xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:1.2"

  xmlns:its="http://www.w3.org/2005/11/its" its:version="2.0">

  <file original="example.doc" source-language="en" datatype="plaintext">

    <body>

      <trans-unit id="1">

        <source xml:lang="en">This is the content</source>

        <target xml:lang="fr"><mrk mtype="x-itslq"

            its:locQualityIssuesRef="#lq1">c'es</mrk> le contenu</target>

        <its:locQualityIssues xml:id="lq1">

          <its:locQualityIssue locQualityIssueType="misspelling"

            locQualityIssueComment="'c'es' is unknown. Could be 'c'est'"

            locQualityIssueSeverity="50"/>

          <its:locQualityIssue locQualityIssueType="typographical"

            locQualityIssueComment="Sentence without capitalization"

            locQualityIssueSeverity="30"/>

        </its:locQualityIssues>

      </trans-unit>

    </body>

  </file>

</xliff>

 

In the common cases we to just display the IRI of the hrefs such as locNoteHrefPointer. But in the case of standoff we probably want o resolve the values to validate the result. Here’s basic example, putting the numbers in front so we can still sort it. It’s not that pretty though.

 

/xliff/file[1]/body[1]/trans-unit[1]/target[1]/mrk             locQualityIssuesRef="#lq1"(?)                [1]locQualityIssueType="misspelling"     [1]locQualityIssueComment="'c'es' is unknown. Could be 'c'est'"                [1]locQualityIssueSeverity="50"                [2]locQualityIssueType="typographical"            [2]locQualityIssueComment="Sentence without capitalization" [2]locQualityIssueSeverity="30"

 

Fredrik

 





-- 
Felix Sasaki

DFKI / W3C Fellow

Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 12:17:12 UTC