- From: Mauricio del Olmo <mauricio.delolmo@linguaserve.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:01:23 +0100
- To: "'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'" <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Pablo Nieto Caride'" <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>, "'Fredrik Liden'" <fliden@enlaso.com>, "'Leroy Finn'" <finnle@tcd.ie>
- Message-ID: <006501cdbcce$d8377390$88a65ab0$@linguaserve.com>
Hello. I see similar cases with the Domain files: domain1xmloutput.txt current: /doc/body[1] domainPointer="" content="automotive" Wouldn’t it be better to show the domain that applies to the node regardless of where the value is located and in the pointer attribute show the path that points to it? /doc/body[1] domain="automotive" domainPointer="/doc/head/meta[@name='DC.subject']/@content" And with mappings: domain2xmloutput.txt current: /doc/body[1] domainMapping="automotive auto, medical medicine, 'criminal law' law, 'property law' law" domainPointer="" content="automotive" When a mapping applies show the result of the mapping in the domain that applies: /doc/body[1] domain="auto" domainMapping="automotive auto, medical medicine, 'criminal law' law, 'property law' law" domainPointer="/doc/head/meta[@name='DC.subject']/@content" I think this way is much more understandable what the mechanism is (to show the domain or locNote that finally applies to the node) thinking forward for anyone who wants to implement ITS 2.0 in the future (2014, 2015…) not only us. Cheers. __________________________________ Mauricio del Olmo Martínez Dpto. Técnico/I+D+i Linguaserve Internacionalización de Servicios, S.A. Tel.: +34 91 761 64 60 ext. 0421 Fax: +34 91 542 89 28 E-mail: <mailto:tecnico@linguaserve.com> tecnico@linguaserve.com www.linguaserve.com <http://www.linguaserve.com/> «En cumplimiento con lo previsto con los artículos 21 y 22 de la Ley 34/2002, de 11 de julio, de Servicios de la Sociedad de Información y Comercio Electrónico, le informamos que procederemos al archivo y tratamiento de sus datos exclusivamente con fines de promoción de los productos y servicios ofrecidos por LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. En caso de que Vdes. no deseen que procedamos al archivo y tratamiento de los datos proporcionados, o no deseen recibir comunicaciones comerciales sobre los productos y servicios ofrecidos, comuníquenoslo a clients@linguaserve.com, y su petición será inmediatamente cumplida.» "According to the provisions set forth in articles 21 and 22 of Law 34/2002 of July 11 regarding Information Society and eCommerce Services, we will store and use your personal data with the sole purpose of marketing the products and services offered by LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. If you do not wish your personal data to be stored and handled, or you do not wish to receive further information regarding products and services offered by our company, please e-mail us to clients@linguaserve.com. Your request will be processed immediately.” __________________________________ De: Pablo Nieto Caride [mailto:pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 9:55 Para: 'Fredrik Liden'; 'Leroy Finn'; 'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public' Asunto: RE: Test Suit Specs - Pointers and RefPointers I agree with Fredrik, the simpler the better. I also think that maybe we should coordinate to commit changes to the files. By the way Leroy my github user is pnietoca. Cheers, __________________________________ Pablo Nieto Caride Dpto. Técnico/I+D+i Linguaserve Internacionalización de Servicios, S.A. Tel.: +34 91 761 64 60 ext. 0422 Fax: +34 91 542 89 28 E-mail: <mailto:pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com> pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com www.linguaserve.com <http://www.linguaserve.com/> «En cumplimiento con lo previsto con los artículos 21 y 22 de la Ley 34/2002, de 11 de julio, de Servicios de la Sociedad de Información y Comercio Electrónico, le informamos que procederemos al archivo y tratamiento de sus datos exclusivamente con fines de promoción de los productos y servicios ofrecidos por LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. En caso de que Vdes. no deseen que procedamos al archivo y tratamiento de los datos proporcionados, o no deseen recibir comunicaciones comerciales sobre los productos y servicios ofrecidos, comuníquenoslo a clients@linguaserve.com, y su petición será inmediatamente cumplida.» "According to the provisions set forth in articles 21 and 22 of Law 34/2002 of July 11 regarding Information Society and eCommerce Services, we will store and use your personal data with the sole purpose of marketing the products and services offered by LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE SERVICIOS, S.A. If you do not wish your personal data to be stored and handled, or you do not wish to receive further information regarding products and services offered by our company, please e-mail us to clients@linguaserve.com. Your request will be processed immediately.” __________________________________ De: Fredrik Liden [mailto:fliden@enlaso.com] Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 8:26 Para: Leroy Finn; Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public Asunto: Test Suit Specs - Pointers and RefPointers Hi Leroy, We talked a bit about the test output for pointers last Friday. Sorry about the delay sending the example to the list. The examples from the test suite: locnote2htmloutput.txt /html/body[1]/section[2]/span[1] locNoteType="description" locNotePointer="A division by 0 was going to be computed." In the cases of pointers maybe we can just resolve the pointer and show the value as plain locNote. We don’t care to much that it’s from a pointer, just that the value is correct. /html/body[1]/section[2]/span[1] locNote="A division by 0 was going to be computed." locNoteType="description" Locnote4htmloutput.txt /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1] locNoteType="description" locNoteRefPointer="" title="Comments.html#FileNotFound" locnote4xmloutput.txt /dataFile/body[1]/string[1]path=/data[1] locNoteType="description" locNoteRefPointer="" noteFile="Comments.html#FileNotFound" [Fyi, In the cases of refPointers the html and xml examples shows different format title vs. noteFile] Perhaps we can follow the same logic of the pointers in the example above and resolve them and not show the title/noteFile so instead something simpler like: /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1] locNoteRef="Comments.html#FileNotFound" locNoteType="description" and /dataFile/body[1]/string[1]/data[1] locNoteRef="Comments.html#FileNotFound" locNoteType="description" or /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1] locNote="REF:Comments.html#FileNotFound" locNoteType="description" and /dataFile/body[1]/string[1]/data[1] locNote="REF:Comments.html#FileNotFound" locNoteType="description" On a side note, does it make sense for implementers to update the testresult files on GitHub at will or do you prefer us to wait until after Dec 4th. Just as a random example \locale1htmloutput.txt I think it’s missing the following two lines (unless we’re ignoring meta): /html/head[1]/meta[1] /html/head[1]/meta[1]/@charset I’m asking because I know you’re working on the files so I don’t want to cause any inconvenience by introducing unexpected changes if you’re in the middle of something. Perhaps you prefer us to report any findings on a file per file basis to approve the change first? Thanks, Fredrik
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 10:01:55 UTC