Re: Test Suit Specs - Pointers and RefPointers

Fredrik,

I agree with that this will make thing simpler but we need consensus on
this from the group. This will cause some major changes in the update so if
people agree I will post results like discussed in your e-mail. Also as i
have discussed in a previous email i haven't re-run output in a while and
meta has only been added recently to most files so except it to appear in
future output. I am in the middle of updating the test suite parser at the
moment adding in its:param parsing, removing of its: and adding of
alphabetic ordering as discussed in the meeting. I will start working on
the pointer output but it would be nice to hear some feedback on it from
others in the group as well??????

Thanks,
Leroy

On 7 November 2012 08:55, Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>wrote:

> I agree with Fredrik, the simpler the better.****
>
> ** **
>
> I also think that maybe we should coordinate to commit changes to the
> files.****
>
> ** **
>
> By the way Leroy my github user is pnietoca.****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,****
>
> *__________________________________*
>
> *Pablo Nieto Caride*
>
> *Dpto. Técnico/I+D+i*
>
> *Linguaserve Internacionalización de Servicios, S.A.*
>
> *Tel.: +34 91 761 64 60 ext. 0422
> Fax: +34 91 542 89 28 *
>
> *E-mail: **pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com***
>
> *www.linguaserve.com*
>
> * *
>
> *«En cumplimiento con lo previsto con los artículos 21 y 22 de la Ley
> 34/2002, de 11 de julio, de Servicios de la Sociedad de Información y
> Comercio Electrónico, le informamos que procederemos al archivo y
> tratamiento de sus datos exclusivamente con fines de promoción de los
> productos y servicios ofrecidos por LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE
> SERVICIOS, S.A. En caso de que Vdes. no deseen que procedamos al archivo y
> tratamiento de los datos proporcionados, o no deseen recibir comunicaciones
> comerciales sobre los productos y servicios ofrecidos, comuníquenoslo a
> clients@linguaserve.com, y su petición será inmediatamente cumplida.»*
>
> * *
>
> *"According to the provisions set forth in articles 21 and 22 of Law
> 34/2002 of July 11 regarding Information Society and eCommerce Services, we
> will store and use your personal data with the sole purpose of marketing
> the products and services offered by LINGUASERVE INTERNACIONALIZACIÓN DE
> SERVICIOS, S.A. If you do not wish your personal data to be stored and
> handled, or you do not wish to receive further information regarding
> products and services offered by our company, please e-mail us to
> clients@linguaserve.com. Your request will be processed immediately.”*
>
> *__________________________________*****
>
> *De:* Fredrik Liden [mailto:fliden@enlaso.com]
> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 07 de noviembre de 2012 8:26
> *Para:* Leroy Finn; Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
> *Asunto:* Test Suit Specs - Pointers and RefPointers****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Leroy,****
>
> ** **
>
> We talked a bit about the test output for pointers last Friday. Sorry
> about the delay sending the example to the list.****
>
> ** **
>
> The examples from the test suite:****
>
> ** **
>
> *locnote2htmloutput.txt*
>
> /html/body[1]/section[2]/span[1]
> locNoteType="description"         *locNotePointer="A division by 0 was
> going to be computed."*
>
> ** **
>
> In the cases of pointers maybe we can just resolve the pointer and show
> the value as plain locNote. We don’t care to much that it’s from a pointer,
> just that the value is correct.****
>
> ** **
>
> /html/body[1]/section[2]/span[1]           *locNote="A division by 0 was
> going to be computed."*  locNoteType="description"****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Locnote4htmloutput.txt*
>
> /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1]       locNoteType="description"         *locNoteRefPointer=""
> title="Comments.html#FileNotFound"*
>
> ** **
>
> *locnote4xmloutput.txt*
>
> /dataFile/body[1]/string[1]path=/data[1]
> locNoteType="description"         *locNoteRefPointer=""
> noteFile="Comments.html#FileNotFound"*****
>
> ** **
>
> [Fyi, In the cases of refPointers the html and xml examples shows
> different format title vs. noteFile]****
>
> ** **
>
> Perhaps we can follow the same logic of the pointers in the example above
> and resolve them and not show the title/noteFile so instead something
> simpler like:****
>
> ** **
>
> /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1]       *locNoteRef="Comments.html#FileNotFound"*                locNoteType="description"
> ****
>
> and****
>
> /dataFile/body[1]/string[1]/data[1]        *
> locNoteRef="Comments.html#FileNotFound"* locNoteType="description" ****
>
> ** **
>
> or****
>
> ** **
>
> /html/body[1]/p[1]/span[1]       *locNote="REF:Comments.html#FileNotFound"
> *               locNoteType="description"****
>
> and****
>
> /dataFile/body[1]/string[1]/data[1]        *
> locNote="REF:Comments.html#FileNotFound"*
> locNoteType="description" ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On a side note, does it make sense for implementers to update the
> testresult files on GitHub at will or do you prefer us to wait until after
> Dec 4th. Just as a random example *\locale1htmloutput.txt *I think it’s
> missing the following two lines (unless we’re ignoring meta):****
>
> * *
>
> /html/head[1]/meta[1]                ****
>
> /html/head[1]/meta[1]/@charset****
>
> ** **
>
> I’m asking because I know you’re working on the files so I don’t want to
> cause any inconvenience by introducing unexpected changes if you’re in the
> middle of something. Perhaps you prefer us to report any findings on a file
> per file basis to approve the change first? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Fredrik****
>
> ** **
>