Re: locqualityissuexml

Hey Phil,

We have recently updated the input files to reflect the changes in the
draft so you will have to re run the output also we have added in tests for
standoff markup as well. The only major thing that will cause problem for
your parser is the standoff markup. The rest of the files should output
fine we had to do one or two corrections in relation to using "spelling"
instead of "misspelling" for its:locQualityIssueType. So once that is re
ran you should be fine for the commitment on Monday.

Thanks,
Leroy


On 13 December 2012 13:18, Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

>  i'm probably behind the curve here, but do do we have something in place
> where we post these results up and somehow get them checked and formally
> 'passed'
>
> cheers,
> Dave
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: locqualityissuexml  Resent-Date:
> Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:55 +0000  Resent-From:
> public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org  Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:01
> +0000  From: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> <philr@vistatec.ie>  To:
> public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org
>
>
> Leroy
>
> Attached is our output for all xml locqualityissue tests except those that
> use its:param. We're working on the html.
>
>
>
> Phil.
>
>
> ************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the sender immediately by e-mail.
>
> www.vistatec.com
> ************************************************************
>
>
>