RE: MT Confidence issues

Hi Leroy,

 

Thanks for the update.

 

-- 1) For the annotatorsRef attribute, I would suggest to have a few cases where the value is inherited/overriden and/or mixed with other data categories. For example:

 

  <body its:annotatorsRef="mt-confidence|file:///tools.xml#T1" >

    <p its:annotatorsRef="disambiguation|file:///tools.xml#T2" >

      <span  id="ireland">Dublin is the capital city of Ireland and has the 50th biggest population density in Europe.</span>

      <span id="spain">Madrid is the capital of Spain.</span>

      <span  its:annotatorsRef="mt-confidence|file:///tools.xml#T3" id="germany">Berlin is the capital of Germany.</span>

      <span  id="england">London is the capital of England</span>

    </p>

</body>

 

This would provide some coverage for the way the annotatorsRef values are overridden and presented for each node, as described here: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20121206/#its-tool-annotation

 

 

-- 2) There are a few files were “capital” is misspelled “capital” and “population” is misspelled “popluation”.

 

cheers,

-yves

 

 

From: Leroy Finn [mailto:finnle@tcd.ie] 
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 10:14 AM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
Subject: Re: MT Confidence issues

 

I have updated the parser for ITS Tool now and have some initial output the sample output can be found on the git hub under MT Confidence in XML here https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/tree/master/its2.0/expected/mtconfidence/xml. I am currently working on the new HTML files for MT Confidence. I will also update Terminology soon which uses termConfidence . Some feedback on this output for XML MT Confidence would be useful in case i have the wrong idea about the output as i assume the inheritance is just only elements.

 

Leroy

 

On 6 December 2012 16:05, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:

Hey Yves, 

 

Yeah i spotted that and i am just after noticing  termConfidence  for terminology which I have to add in now. Also annotatorsRef has to be used in disambiguation and LQ Issues which have to be corrected anyway so that both are up to date with the editors draft

 

Leroy

 

On 6 December 2012 15:54, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> wrote:

Hi Leroy,

Thanks.

Just a reminder: The annotatorsRef attribute is not part of the MT Confidence data category, but it is mandatory to have one set when using MT Confidence. So we should make sure it's in the output in the test results for MT Confidence.

-yves


From: Leroy Finn [mailto:finnle@tcd.ie]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 8:50 AM
To: Jirka Kosek
Cc: Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
Subject: Re: MT Confidence issues


I am updating this now based on the editors draft http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#mtconfidence

Leroy

On 28 November 2012 10:24, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:
I will try to make these updates today.

Leroy

On 27 November 2012 22:28, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:
Hi,

for MT confidence test file are not reflecting the latest version of
spec as well. Leroy, do you have idea when these could be updated?

                                Jirka

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 17:55:27 UTC