W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Comments on section 8.4 (Terminology)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:50:48 +0200
Message-ID: <51DD0448.4060002@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
On 10/07/13 06:57, Yves Savourel wrote:

> Yes, when term is set to "no" there is little one can do with the other information.
> In general I would tend to preserve the information, in case the user wants to turn it back on. If s/he would really want to get rid
> of the information s/he would probably just delete the annotation.
>
> [snip]
>
> Many translation tool have little support for terminology management, and allowing the minimal information term='yes' may still be
> useful for the translator. It can be used, for example, by a tool different from the one that created the document, to list look up
> an external term list.
> It can also be used to markup the result of a statistical-based process to identify term candidates. Those would not have yet a link
> to a definition or a translation.
>
> I hope this helps,

Yes it does! Thanks a lot!

</Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 06:51:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:28 UTC