- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 12:21:18 +0200
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- CC: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
On 05/07/13 11:45, Jirka Kosek wrote: >> 1. Nothing is said about the weird case of a XHTML document using >> _both_ its-* attributes AND attributes in the its namespace > > I think that such document would be non-conforming, see > http://www.w3.org/TR/its20/#conformance-class-html5-its, as HTML5 itself > prohibits any foreign attributes. What about XHTML 1 and 1.1 ? These beasts are not unseen unicorns, the world of EPUB2 for instance is full of them. > I understand that this will make detection much easier, but not all > libraries for serializing XML are giving you enough control over places > where namespace declarations will actually appear. So my preference > would be to require its:version attribute on the root element if we > really want to have something ITS specific on the root element. A namespace declaration being an attribute set on an element and visible/editable in the OM, I absolutely don't see what you mean. If the libraries you mention cannot control where they set the its namespace, they have a serious problem. </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 5 July 2013 10:21:40 UTC