- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:42:41 +0100
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <510A9F01.8090104@kosek.cz>
On 31.1.2013 16:45, Yves Savourel wrote:
> "XHTML documents aimed at public consumption by Web browsers SHOULD
> use syntax for local attributes described in Section 6.1: Mapping of
> Local Data Categories to HTML and SHOULD NOT use inline global rules
> in order to adhere to DOM Consistency HTML Design Principle."
>
> I don't understand why we have to use <its:rules> directly rather
> than inside <script> for XHTML since the stated goal of the "DOM
> Consistency" seems to be to have the same tree. If we use
> <its:rules>..</its:rules> in XHTML and
> <script><its:rules>...</its:rules></script> we presumably get
> different trees not identical ones. It seems the "SHOULD NOT" should
> be a "SHOULD" (and the example changed).
I think that confusion comes from the example which was added later. It
should not contain its:rules element at all, only its-* attributes.
Yves, would removing the its:rules from the example dissolve your concerns?
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:43:09 UTC