Re: issue-60 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)

Am 11.12.12 14:56, schrieb Jirka Kosek:
> On 11.12.2012 14:45, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
>> As discussed previously at DFKI, adding a new value could be interpreted
>> as a normative, that is substantive change. This would mean at least 3
>> weeks of delay for another last call period. Hence we need to be careful
>> in handling this proposal and discussing it in the group.
> Hi Felix,
>
> is this really case which needs additional LC? Adding new value in a
> rather long enumeration is backward compatible with existing ITS markup
> and seems as a quite minor change for me.
Hi Jirka,

that would be fine by me - I'd just like to hear some other people 
expressing their opinion :)

Best,

Felix

Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 13:59:21 UTC