Re: issue-60 (Re: Comment on ITS 2.0 specification WD)

On 11.12.2012 14:45, Felix Sasaki wrote:

> As discussed previously at DFKI, adding a new value could be interpreted
> as a normative, that is substantive change. This would mean at least 3
> weeks of delay for another last call period. Hence we need to be careful
> in handling this proposal and discussing it in the group.

Hi Felix,

is this really case which needs additional LC? Adding new value in a
rather long enumeration is backward compatible with existing ITS markup
and seems as a quite minor change for me.

      Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------