Re: Phone call on most important priorities for W3C [Core] (Was Re: Proceeding with [Core] via email discussion )

apologies; am travelling.

On 15 January 2015 at 14:35, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
> Reminder,
>
> Next call in 30 minutes:
>
> 10AM ET
> 4PM CEST
> 1-617-761-6200
> Code 2673
> IRC #most
>
>
> On 12/23/2014 9:41 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>
> Today, I've also put a more elaborated discussion of these questions in our
> wiki [1] if people would like to comment there.
>
> Jeff
>
> [1]
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/AB/2014-2015_Priorities/w3c_most_important#Core_task_force
>
> On 12/18/2014 10:17 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>
> On today's scheduled [Core] call there was disappointing attendance and
> insufficient critical mass to make progress.
>
> We decided to progress via mailing list and wiki for now, until our first
> phone call a month from now (January 15th).
>
> Here are some relevant points.
>
> 1. The agenda for today's call was comprised of a set of questions below.  I
> invite discussion of these questions on the mailing list as a way to move
> this forward.
>
> 2. If there are other items that you feel we should explore as part of "what
> is most important for the core of the Web", please add your thoughts as
> well.
>
> 3. Early next year, the Team will try to address some of these questions as
> well.  That will provide further fodder for our discussion.  Let me know if
> you have questions/comments for the Team.
>
> Jeff
>
> On 12/9/2014 9:39 PM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>
>
>
> Here is the agenda for the Core call on 18 December.
>
> 1. Application Foundations - do we have the right categories?
>
> Are there topics that are currently omitted that should be added?
>
> For example, at the TPAC breakout, Daniel Glazmann proposed that we needed
> to focus on UI requirements as well.
>
> Is the taxonomy correct?  Should the functions be re-factored differently
> (move things around between categories; subdivide categories)
>
> 2. Developer input.  Most of us work inside organizations that produce
> infrastructure - we don't have sufficient number of developers in the
> discussion.  How do we get more developer input?  What kind of roadshow
> might work?  This would help us answer questions such as:
>
> Are we providing developers what they need in each area.  For example: are
> we providing everything needed to ensure secure apps? Are we providing
> everything that is needed to deal with responsive design?  Are we making all
> the knobs needed available for performance?  How should the task force start
> taking on these questions?
>
> 3. Next steps:
>
> Description of Application Foundations: Is the description in the blog post
> accurate?  Is it at the right level of description?  Does it need more
> detail?  Less detail?
> Mapping of existing work: Assemble a list of all existing work and make
> clear which category it fits in.
>
> I don't expect to reach closure on these items, but we should discuss how we
> make progress during the course of this effort.
>
> The next meeting of Core is 15 January; then bi-weekly after that.
>
> I will do some work on the wiki in the next few days to reflect our status.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 15:10:14 UTC