- From: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:34:02 +0100
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-modernguide@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 10:34:27 UTC
On 20 Oct 2012, at 05:19, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >> • Tell me about your WG(s). >> (Clarification question: size, activity, history, specific challenges) > > I think the first question may be too broad. I do think asking what the biggest challenges to getting work done is a good idea. Maybe not as the first question. Remember this is a conversation, not a survey. Asking about the WG is a very effective way to begin, and gives a lot of follow-up material, a la "so you said your group was very active. How do you…" > How about we ask these questions in a breakout session and treat it like a focus group? We can. Focus groups and interviews obviously yield different kinds of insights. I tend to prefer the quality and depth of one-on-one interviews - focus groups have a tendency to just amplify "obvious" concerns and feedback from usual loudmouths. But it's less time consuming. Why not. Olivier
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 10:34:27 UTC