- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:49:39 +0100
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: "public-mobileOK-checker@w3.org" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 10:50:22 UTC
Le jeudi 10 janvier 2008 à 09:50 +0000, Jo Rabin a écrit : > We'd probably also benefit from making sure all the documents are tied > up, that the checker and the documentation are properly in line and so > on. Also a formal reconciliation on tests vs warns and fails might be in > order - cf ACTION-609 I think. Attached is a quick pass at looking at whether our tests as implemented match what is in mobileOK. It was generated with the XSLT also attached (there is a local path in it that needs to be modified if you want to use it). It completely misses some tests messages: * due to misnaming of test results ids: - IMAGES_RESIZING_IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE instead of IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE - CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT_AND_VALID_MARKUP instead of CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT - AUTO_REFRESH_REDIRECTION instead of AUTO_REFRESH * the messages that are produced purely in Java - I'll look into extracting them in a separate XML file to have them included in my XSLT: - MEASURES - http_response (although I suspect they also use a different naming convention, since a quick grep didn't reveal that phrase in the code) I haven't reviewed whether the messages are associated to the correct tests yet. Dom
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 10:50:22 UTC