- From: Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 09:59:55 +0200
- To: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
> This looks pretty good to me -- go ahead and convert the rest of the > XSLTs to this convention and delete the Java version? done. I do not delete any Java code, but remove the Java XSLT dependencies in Caching and AutoRefreshRedirection test (if you like, I can finish this test). Today I must regret the telco - sorry! It would be great, if the XSLT result format could be discussed or finalized. My position, what the document must have: * a unique name for each test (NON-TEXT_ALTERNATIVES) * a result for each warning/error * a warning/error ID should have: * a message for each result * the fault in the document, the code snippet or something else * a sample, how to make it better maybe have: * a result for a valid document? is no FAIL result enough? Cheers, Roland
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 08:00:03 UTC