Re: ACTION: The order of HTTP Headers

On 5/23/07, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote:
> What I don't understand is how we are to create the expected result
> version of the moki doc. I think the main point is to make sure that the
> checker throws the right FAILs and WARNs for a given input. However, I'm
> not sure that one can test the operation of the pre-processor that way.
> So fwiw I'm all for including the moki doc in the output, just don't
> make it part of the comparison. (and anyway, what about the things that
> _must_ change, like Date?)

Meh, OK. I don't so much like the idea of not testing this output at
all, though I agree that the real important output is the test results
doc. I'll pull out the test.

I had been special-casing Date fields and not failing on differences there.

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:46:46 UTC