- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:40:12 +0100
- To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>
- Cc: <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
> > > However, it also leads me to ask whether a moki document will actually > > form part of that comparison? Surely we will be comparing the results > > format? If that is RDF then I suppose we will have to use an RDF tool to > > make the comparison? > > Roland requested that we incorporate the moki document into the unit > tests for each test. Unless it causes undue burden, I think it's good > to validate this output as well. What I don't understand is how we are to create the expected result version of the moki doc. I think the main point is to make sure that the checker throws the right FAILs and WARNs for a given input. However, I'm not sure that one can test the operation of the pre-processor that way. So fwiw I'm all for including the moki doc in the output, just don't make it part of the comparison. (and anyway, what about the things that _must_ change, like Date?) Jo
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:40:37 UTC