- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:51:17 +0100
- To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>
- Cc: "Laura Holmes" <holmes@google.com>, <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
I remain sceptical that this aspect of the caching tests should actually be in mobileOK at all - and would prefer that we removed it than run around the houses in this way, since it doesn't tell us anything specifically mobile. Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok- > checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Owen > Sent: 26 June 2007 15:47 > To: Roland Gülle > Cc: Laura Holmes; public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > Subject: Re: CachingTest HTTP header re-request > > I don't think it makes sense to do these re-requests in the > preprocessing phase, since it's only needed in some cases, and doesn't > meaningfully contribute to uses of the intermediate document outside > mobileOK Basic. I think it's pushing this approach a notch too far and > bloats the intermediate doc. In any event that part of the moki doc > hasn't been implemented by anyone yet, so I'd suggest we use Java in > exactly cases like this. > > On 6/26/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Laura, > > > > > Is anyone attached to this implementation for any specific reason? > > > And if so, can you explain to me the logic behind the request being > > > implemented prior to this comparison? > > Im attatched: > > http://docs.google.com/View?docID=w.dgh5r6zs_5cb7gz3&revision=_latest > > but not for specific reason - if you want to attach, go for it! > > > > Actually there is no re-request in the XSLT implemented. > > The XPath: > > <xsl:if test="ancestor::HTTPResponse[1]/following- > > sibling::HTTPResponse[1] > > and > > not(ancestor::HTTPResponse[1]/following- > > sibling::HTTPResponse[1]/status[@code = '304'])"> > > checks the result of the re-request in the moki document, so the > > current implementation needs the 'intelligence' to handle re-request > > in the moki document generator. > > > > The question to all: > > Should be this handled in the moki document generator or should the > > XSLT call java code when this is needed? > > > > Cheers, > > Roland > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 14:51:41 UTC