Re: Namespaces in messages.properties.xml

Sounds like we should make a separate namespace for this document. I
know we can pick what we like but what's the convention? is
http://www.w3.org/2007/05/moki/messages suitable?

On 6/26/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote:
> > At the moment it seems like it's a question of whether re-using the
> > moki namespace is much of a sin. As this is a W3C product, seems like
> > we should take extra care to get it right.
> Agreed!
> So the question again: Is there another way, maybe changing the
> default namespace?

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 14:28:54 UTC