- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:38:03 +0100
- To: Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com>, "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Hi Roland It's a trivial change (the power of XSLT) for me to do the IDs per what you were expecting -i.e. make uppercase, remove the "test_" and change the _n to -n, so I will do that. Jo > -----Original Message----- > From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok- > checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roland Gülle > Sent: 30 August 2007 08:16 > To: public-mobileok-checker > Subject: Fwd: mobileOK Basic Version 1zf > > > Hi Jo and all, > > first - thanks Jo for the latest document [1]. > I choose this list because I have not looked in the doc detailed and > I have some mobileok-checker questions about the changes: > > Should we update the tests to this status of document or wait for > more response on the MWBP list? > > > - each warn and fail has a unique id (which pops up if your browser > > supports the abbr element) > We have to change all result names from: > AUTO_REFRESH_REDIRECTION-2 => test_auto_refresh_2 > Should we also rename the test from: > AUTO_REFRESH_REDIRECTION => test_auto_refresh > to keep it consistent and add also this name to the mobileOK Basic doc? > > > If there is nothing to be said against this, > I would update the IDs in the XSLT and try to update all tests > against the latest document before the F2F. > (It seems some space before the F2F to do this) > > Cheers, > Roland > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Basic-1.0- > Tests/070824
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 08:38:27 UTC