- From: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:26:51 +0200
- To: "Jo Rabin" <jrabin@mtld.mobi>, "public-mobileok-checker" <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
>> >>>In anyway in final mobile checker there will be no SAC code so no >>>copyright issues will arise. >> >>Personally, I think it is too soon to say :-) You are right. I would like to change "in final mobile" for "this first mobile" >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok- >>> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miguel Garcia >>> Sent: 23 August 2007 09:57 >>> To: public-mobileok-checker >>> Subject: RE: Source of code in CSSUtils >>> >>> >>> When I was looking for SAC information I found a forum where someone >>> asked for a simple example of SAC usage and someone else answered with >>> an extract of that java code. Sorry I can't find that page again. >>> >>> In anyway in final mobile checker there will be no SAC code so no >>> copyright issues will arise. >>> >>> Miguel >>> >>> >>-----Mensaje original----- >>> >>De: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org [mailto:public-mobileok- >>> >>checker-request@w3.org] En nombre de Jo Rabin >>> >>Enviado el: martes, 21 de agosto de 2007 17:12 >>> >>Para: public-mobileok-checker >>> >>Asunto: RE: Source of code in CSSUtils >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>It looks rather similar to >>> >>>>http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/tags/legalspr4/WEB-INF/lps/serv er >>> /s >>> >>rc/org/openlaszlo/css/CSSHandler.java >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>Jo >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> From: public-mobileok-checker-request@w3.org >>> [mailto:public-mobileok- >>> >>> checker-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Owen >>> >>> Sent: 21 August 2007 15:56 >>> >>> To: public-mobileok-checker; Miguel Garcia >>> >>> Subject: Source of code in CSSUtils >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Following on Jo's question today on the call -- I'm not sure the >>> right >>> >>> people were present to answer it -- >>> >>> >>> >>> Jo was saying that he thought the code in CSSUtils actually came >>> from >>> >>> another source? like the W3C CSS validator project maybe? if so, >>> that >>> >>> is OK, we just need to make sure it is attributed correctly by >>> adding >>> >>> some kind of attribution, the right copyright statement, and a >>copy >>> of >>> >>> the license. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sean >>> >> >>>
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 10:00:06 UTC