- From: Laura Holmes <holmes@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:49:39 -0400
- To: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <135a9f560708061349n5b25d8bmc289acd419e857ea@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I just wanted to lay out an agenda for some of the things I'd like to discuss on the call tomorrow. Following at discussion about your September F2F, I'd really like to hash out the details of our final CSS implementation. It'd be really great if those who have contributed to the development of the CSS->XML parser were present. Here's some of the issues: 1) What is the status of the CSS->XML parser? There still isn't support for: - recognizing @import tags - parsing out the values defined in properties into usable values (i.e. url() and the actual url, 10px) It'd be great to establish how much work this would take to change before we make final decisions. 2) Discuss arguments for and against testing css with regular expressions I've already implemented retrieval of references to other external stylesheets and images (and just recently added the code to CVS in CSSUtils) Just for your reference, we'll need to consider: - external, embedded, and inline style sheets - external resources - parsing of dimensions for positioning - identification of all the elements mentioned in: http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#test_style_sheets_use and http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#test_style_sheets_support 3) With some of the additional time I have with my internship, I'm going to be adding in support for suite level errors. The kinds of errors that will be included in that list are http request and response errors, like those outlined in http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#http_response Does anyone else have recommendations as to what else I should include in these suite level errors? If you think there's anything I missed, feel free to send it out on the list prior to the call. Thanks and talk to you all tomorrow! Cheers, Laura
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 20:50:02 UTC