- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 01:42:54 +0000
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 30/10/2020 01:37, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > trying to define size by not defining size can be > gamed the opposite way, resulting in super-small controls but with ample > clearance? I think this gets the SC back to where it started, and its slight identity crisis - is it trying to define minimum clearance/spacing, or minimum size, or both? P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 30 October 2020 01:43:11 UTC