+1 to your latest suggestion Alaistar. On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:32 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Patrick wrote: > > Is that not what was intended? I'm lost now... > > I think you were referring to Jake's original text. > > Sunday evening (our time) I suggested: > “For each target, the distance to the furthest side of each adjacent > target is at least 24 CSS pixels, except when:” > > Detlev wrote: > > "I wouldn't assume that 'any adjacent target' includes nested targets... > So I guess some extra language would be needed for the edge case of nested > targets?" > > Good point, so working the extension in would be something like: > > For each target, the distance to the furthest side of each adjacent target > is at least 24 CSS pixels, except when: > - Inline: The target is in a sentence or block of text; > - User Agent Control: The size or spacing of targets is determined by > the user agent and is not modified by the author; > - Essential: A particular presentation of the target is essential to the > information being conveyed. > Unless the target is enclosed within another target, where it has a > minimum height and width of 24 CSS pixels. > > Cheers, > > -Alastair >
Received on Monday, 2 November 2020 22:37:59 UTC