"from each target’s edge to the to the furthest edge of any other target is at least 24 CSS" First thought: It does not prevent / provide enough space between both. Example: a 10x10px target sitting next to a 10x40px target sitting next to a 10x10px target The 10x10px target may be missed while trying to activate as there's NOT the 24 px space apart as the 10x40px absorbs this. Second thought: The 10x40px ALSO HAS THE RULE, (making the 10x10 fail) so it seems fine! Thx Alastair! Op zo 1 nov. 2020 om 23:23 schreef Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com >: > Sukriti wrote: > > > The second one misses distance from where on the target. > > Ok, so perhaps: > > “The distance from each target’s edge to the to the furthest edge of any > other target is at least 24 CSS pixels, except when:” > > That might give the impression of lots of calculations, but (I think) has > the same effect as you’d only look at anything within 24px. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2020, 1:42 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > wrote: > > > any feedback on?: "*For each edge of a target, the distance to the > closest edge of the nearest target on the opposite side is at least 24 CSS > pixels, except when:":* > > > > I think I see what you mean, but the “opposite side” aspect is confusing > me quite a lot when combined with “closest edge”. > > > > Does it mean the same as this? > > “For each target, the distance to the furthest side of each adjacent > target is at least 24 CSS pixels, except when:” > > > > -Alastair > >
Received on Monday, 2 November 2020 08:31:07 UTC