- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 15:16:43 +0000
- To: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DM6PR03MB410678A3B1B79DA878A6E978F1A50@DM6PR03MB4106.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
+1 to the representation wording as well. Jon From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 10:34 AM To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> Cc: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org Subject: Re: Add Dragging SC to WCAG 2.2 draft CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > If we remove target and adjust that, it would be: <p>an operation where the pointer engages with an element on the down event and the element (or a representation of its position) follows the pointer until the up event, without requiring movement through an intermediate point</p> <p class="note">The element could be, for example, a list item, a text element, or an image.</p> How’s that? +1 JF On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 5:21 AM Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de<mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>> wrote: Alastair proposed: <p>an operation where the pointer engages with an element on the down event and the element (or a representation of its position) follows the pointer until the up event, without requiring movement through an intermediate point</p> <p class="note">The element could be, for example, a list item, a text element, or an image.</p> I am happy with this wording. Detlev -- Detlev Fischer DIAS GmbH -- John Foliot | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good deque.com<http://deque.com/> "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2020 15:16:59 UTC