Re: Possibility of retiring proposed SC "Concurrent input mechanisms"

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
> wrote:

> I agree.
> Detlev
>
> Sent from phone
>
> > Am 27.01.2017 um 10:19 schrieb Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk
> >:
> >
> > For consideration of the TF, I'd propose retiring
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/64 unless we can make a compelling
> case that PwD are more severely affected by this compared to other user
> groups. Something that's perhaps better suited for Silver?
> >
> > P
> > --
> > Patrick H. Lauke
> >
> > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>
>