What do you mean "mark as important?" Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:17 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote: > > > > > *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] > *Sent:* Monday, May 09, 2016 1:17 PM > *To:* White, Jason J > > My issue with point of regard is that it would be difficult to test ... > perhaps it could be something like.... less than xxxx pixels from the point > of focus. However, I understand that the Point of regard may not be > anywhere near the focus, which would make defining it in a testable way > harder... > > > Would it be too strong to require the author to mark as important any > sufficiently significant change to a user interface component that does not > have focus? Sufficiently significant would include, at least, changes > caused by a user’s action, and certain other changes as well, according to > a yet to be defined criterion. > > > > If the point of regard just happens to coincide with the location of the > change, that’s just good fortune so far as the user is concerned, but it > shouldn’t affect the requirement that the author needs to meet. > > > > ------------------------------ > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. > > Thank you for your compliance. > ------------------------------ >
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 19:13:29 UTC