Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop

 How about thi
​s?​

*Note 8: Sometimes specifically optimized views are delivered to the user
agent based on screen size, device type, etc. A WCAG conforming view linked
from such an optimized view could only be considered a conforming
alternative if it has the same functionality as this optimized view. For
example, a large screen view with a complicated menu, more content, or
additional interface elements would not be a conforming alternative to a
view optimized for small screen because the two have different
functionality.

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:20 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 29, 2016 8:58 AM
>
> I'm thinking, (hoping) that we are coming to agreement that we can all
> live with on this even though we may have some differences.
>
>
>
> I expect there will be many responsive sites going forward. My experience
> is the mega menu turns to hamburger, and other widgets like expand/collapse
> change, the rest of the content stays the same. We want to ensure that
> those things that change for the mobile don't force the user to go looking
> for a link to a site that has been optimized for a faster connection, more
> powerful computer, bigger screen etc.
>
>
>
> I've incorporated Patrick's language language into Note 8, and provided an
> example to ensure that the these specific concerns are covered.
>
>
>
> Here it is:
>
>
>
> ·        *Note 8: Sometimes specifically optimized views are delivered to
> the user agent based on screen size, device type, etc. A WCAG conforming
> view linked from such an optimized view could only be considered a
> conforming alternative if it has the same functionality as this optimized
> view. For example, a large screen view with a mega menu, more content, and
> more complicated interface would not be a conforming alternative to a view
> optimized for small screen because the two have different functionality.
>
>
>
> *[Jason] That’s fine, except that I’ve never encountered the term “mega
> menu” before and I’m surely not alone. Do you have a more explanatory
> substitute?*
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>

Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2016 13:52:25 UTC