Re: Conforming alternative for mobile should not be Desktop

I (cautiously) agree with the sentiment expressed here (and the fact 
that you used "large screen" vs "small screen" wording). However, it 
could be argued that as long there's a link or similar mechanism to go 
from the (inaccessible) mobile view to the (accessible) desktop view - 
which IS required as per point 4 of the definition - then it's fine in 
the same way that having two alternatives purely on desktop is fine? 
Considering that the "desktop" view will be accessible on the 
phone/tablet (but will likely be less *usable* due to the for the user 
to zoom/scroll horizontally/etc)?

i.e. I don't see how a special case can be made to plug the gap only in 
the specific mobile/desktop situation.

P


On 28/06/2016 13:29, David MacDonald wrote:
> We currently have a bit of a hole in WCAG 2 that I think we should plug
> in 2.1.
>
> If a web page has a conforming alternative, then it doesn't need to
> conform itself. However, in the world of responsible design, it means if
> the desktop version conforms, the mobile version does not need to. I
> think we should plug this in WCAG 2.1.
>
> It might be as  simple as adding a sentence to the definition of
> conforming alternative that large screen views of web pages do not
> qualify as a conforming alternative to small screen views. It will take
> some thought as to the exact wording and approach but it needs to be
> addressed I woulds say, otherwise organizations may just say they don't
> meed to make the mobile view accessible.
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#conforming-alternate-versiondef
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
>
> /            Including those with disabilities/
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 12:46:11 UTC