Re: Comments on proposed new SC 2.5.3

done.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> I think you accidentally only replied to me, rather than the group...I've
> rejoined this to the conversation thread there.
>
> On 20/04/2016 16:59, David MacDonald wrote:
> > Thanks Patrick
> > I've made the corrections, and added the clarifying comments.
> >
> > I think there are two minor things to decide on before release to the
> > wider WCAG:
> >
> > 1) The new handle is "Avoid accidental activation" I think we can can
> > drop the "Avoid" and just call it "Accidental Activation" with the word
> > "avoid" being implicit.
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> > 2)
> > Do we want to call it the
> > up-event
> > as a hyphenated new term, or
> > "up" event
> > with quotes around the up.
> >
> > It's a new term, so my preference would be to give it a link to the
> > glossary with a definition and call it the up-event. We don't use quotes
> > in that way around any other SC, so I'd rather define up-event.
> >
> > Proposal for a definition:
> >
> > Up-Event
> > The activation of a component when the triggering stimulus is released.
>
> I'd maybe reword slightly and add some example to clarify the glossary
> definition, along lines of
>
> Up-Event
> The event fired as part of a component's activation when the triggering
> stimulus is released. For instance, in the case of a touchscreen
> interaction, the event fired when a finger is lifted from the touchscreen
> at the end of a tap.
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>
>