- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:44:22 +0000
- To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 17/12/2015 22:32, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > It's not outside of developer *thinking*, but simply outside of > developer *control*. There is no way for a dev to guarantee a certain > physical rendering size. All it would take is a device to come around > with some crazy mapping In fact, we don't even need to look very far. If we're taking these guidelines to also apply to touchscreen laptops, there's now a huge range of Windows 10 touch-enabled laptops out there, in a variety of physical screen sizes and default resolutions. Additionally, users can even set their overall resolution to something non-standard on these devices (leaving aside the fact that if they set their resolution too high, they shouldn't really complain if things get too small to touch on the touchscreen). > (and I now remember the uproar that went around > the responsive web design community when the iPad Mini with its "smaller > screen/same resolution in CSS pixels" came out) for any previously safe > and conformant content to be immediately non-conformant when tested on > that device.Sure, devs will likely find some hacky loophole to try and > make their sites/content work ok even in those scenarios, but it's > basically a fundamentally shaky foundation to build a hard pass/fail > requirement on. In essence, if they find out that a device (like the iPad Mini) renders their content and controls too small, they may think "ah, I should really see if I can somehow tweak this to make it a bit more usable on this device"...but if there was a hard requirement in an SC it'd be "ah, I must somehow find a way to make it bigger for this device, otherwise my previous PASS will be a FAIL under the 'mobile' extension for WCAG". This makes me wonder slightly if it's even possible to enshrine what is effectively a usability issue as a hard accessibility SC...unless it's kept VERY vague and/or provides mitigiating circumstances (which would then weaken it considerably as a hard SC). P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2015 22:45:10 UTC