- From: Jon Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 15:46:29 -0500
- To: "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
- Cc: "public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org>
True, the dynamic text feature is rarely supported even by Apple and Google apps. Jonathan > On Mar 7, 2014, at 3:02 PM, "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocadu.ca> wrote: > > Most smartphone platforms also have a platform level text-size setting that any app, can choose to respect or not. For example, the BBC news native app. > > I don't think this info is yet available to mobile web content via media queries but presumably it could one day. > > Cheers, > Jan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jonathan Avila [mailto:jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com] >> Sent: March-07-14 2:49 PM >> To: Richards, Jan; public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org >> Subject: RE: BBC-WCAG2/UAAG2 comparison >> >> JR: 1.4.4 Resize text: Except for captions and images of text, text can be >> resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent without loss of >> content or functionality. >> - so an app could conceivably suppress platform zoom, but provide its own >> zoom. >> >> [jda] There are two types of zoom on a mobile device - 1) pinch zoom in the >> browser that websites can block. It would be unlikely but possible that >> websites could create its own. This is what I was thinking of. Then there >> zooming capabilities in apps like maps, or eBook readers, etc. 2) There is also >> the zoom feature which is an assistive technology. The BBC standard and the >> WCAG techniques are not aimed at the assistive technology feature as that >> would be caught under the conformance requirements -- they are only >> aimed at allowing pinch zoom of up to 200% in the browser. >> >> I was looking for guidance in the Applying WCAG to Non-web ICT document >> and didn't see a lot of help in this area. Clearly the SC doesn't require all >> mobile apps to resize without assistive technology-- but this definitely would >> apply to content areas like documents, webviews, maps, etc. So we'll have >> to find a way to provide techniques or failures but limit the scope to things >> that act like browsers. >> >> Jonathan >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocadu.ca] >> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:07 PM >> To: Jonathan Avila; public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org >> Subject: RE: BBC-WCAG2/UAAG2 comparison >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Thanks for the reply. I have updated the file and re-attached. A few >> comments labelled JR: >> >>> Repeated links to the same resource must be contained within the same >>> link [jda] This relates to H2: Combining adjacent image and text links >>> for the same resource >> >> JR: H2: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H2 >> I agree that this is a good thing for usability, but I don't think there is a >> WCAG2 SC that requires it. >> >> >>> Labels must be placed close to the controls, and be laid out >>> appropriately [jda] This relates to understanding SC 3.3.2 Benefits " >>> Field labels located in close proximity to the associated field assist >>> users of screen magnifiers because the field and label are more likely >>> to visible within the magnified area of the page." >> >> JR: Added. >> >> >>> Where zoom is supported on the platform it must not be suppressed. >>> You indicated this as indirectly related. >>> [jda] I feel this is directly related to SC 1.4.4 not just indirectly >>> -- that was the intention when we wrote the BBC standards. >> >> JR: 1.4.4 Resize text: Except for captions and images of text, text can be >> resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent without loss of >> content or functionality. >> - so an app could conceivably suppress platform zoom, but provide its own >> zoom. >> >> >>> Standard operating system alerts must be used where available [jda] >>> This may relate to SCR18: Providing client-side validation and alert >> >> JR: It could, but nothing is said about platform alerts as the mechanism. >> Of course web content doesn't have direct access to operating system >> mechanism, which is why I put in the relevant UAAG2 SC. >> >> >>> Audio must not play automatically unless the user is made aware this >>> is happening or a pause/stop button is provided @Issue: WCAG2 >>> addresses control, but not auto-play: >>> [jda] I believe these are saying the same thing -- some of the WCAG >>> techniques for Silverlight and Flash talk about turning off auto play. >> >> JR: The techniques do talk about it, I just meant that WCAG doesn't require it >> as the BBC doc does. Again, this is why I added a UAAG2 >> SC...UAAG2 explicitly covers audio players. >> >> Cheers, >> Jan >> >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocadu.ca] >>> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:59 AM >>> To: public-mobile-a11y-tf@w3.org >>> Subject: BBC-WCAG2/UAAG2 comparison >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have attached a document that attempts to map the BBC mobile >>> guidelines to WCAG2 and UAAG2, where relevant. >>> >>> I'm hoping that if we get permission from the BBC to use their >>> techniques that this document can help place them. >>> >>> Unfortunately, I need to give regrets for today's meeting due to a >> conflict. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> (MR) JAN RICHARDS >>> PROJECT MANAGER >>> INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC) OCAD UNIVERSITY >>> >>> T 416 977 6000 x3957 >>> F 416 977 9844 >>> E jrichards@ocadu.ca
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 20:47:02 UTC