Re: VR schema proposal - need some help

My main contact has been on vacation. She's back next week. More to come!
Thanks for checking, Thad!!!

Aaron Abbott

inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
remixer
website:     https://persuasivedata.com
let's connect:     www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
*We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Aaron,
>
> Any more progress towards your VR schema proposal ?
>
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:46 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thad,
>>
>> Makes sense to me to have a different group of properties to support MR
>> (AR/VR) application.
>>
>> Ie: AR logo (Bit like ico or flavicon) (denoted with a recommended
>> formats, types and sizes in either 2d or 3d formats).
>>
>> Which may be a property under MrMediaObjects
>>
>> Or something else so we don't have people complaining about patriarchal
>> terminology...?!
>>
>> Tim.h.
>>
>>
>> On Thu., 29 Jun. 2017, 4:54 am Thad Guidry, <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Aaron,
>>>
>>> OK, right in that case its still a MediaObject.
>>>
>>> But since this object is used in the VR industry, which is still
>>> developing and new formats and new containers are still being created all
>>> the time, we will need to surface those common properties, as Vicki says,
>>> into a new Type for the industry to utilize.  Just don't lose sight of how
>>> the Broadcasting industry also deals with containers and formats that are
>>> very similar in your use case, is all I am asking :)  (your VRObject might
>>> just be a container format that becomes an industry standard later on, and
>>> that's fine also)
>>>
>>> To answer your previous previous questions, Yes currently its fine to
>>> say that a particular MediaObject or VRObject can contain many parts such
>>> as many ImageObject's
>>> You can currently use hasPart which is borrowed from CreativeWork to say
>>> that
>>>
>>> {
>>>   "@context": "http://schema.org",
>>>   "@type": "MediaObject",
>>>   "contentUrl": "http://media.example.org/data/0/previews/Edinburgh_
>>> Streets.vrn",
>>>   "description": "VRnow scene of part of Edinburgh streets",
>>>   "duration": "T0M60S",
>>>   "encodingFormat": "VRnow",
>>>   "name": "Edinburgh_Streets.vrn",
>>>   "hasPart": [
>>>             {
>>>               "@type": "ImageObject",
>>>               "name": "A pic of Charlotte Square"
>>>             },
>>>             {
>>>               "@type": "ImageObject",
>>>               "name": "A pic of Princes Street"
>>>             }
>>>           ]
>>> }
>>>
>>> On the Playground at *http://tinyurl.com/y95vhwdk
>>> <http://tinyurl.com/y95vhwdk>*
>>>
>>> Your welcome Aaron !
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM Aaron Abbott <aaron@persuasivedata.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thad,
>>>>
>>>> I am meeting with my client tomorrow and will get as many answers and
>>>> details as possible. I will try to get one of their lead developers
>>>> involved on this thread as well. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> As far as a clump of pictures, it's not like that. The clump of images
>>>> are available, but the final embed is an assembled self-contained media
>>>> object. An similar example would be the use of a SWF from and FLA if we
>>>> were still doing Flash. Like I said though, let me see if I can get them to
>>>> jump into the discussion, and if I can get permission to expose who they
>>>> are.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Aaron Abbott
>>>>
>>>> inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
>>>> remixer
>>>> website:     https://persuasivedata.com
>>>> let's connect:     www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
>>>> *We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sure that's fine.  But...
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd prefer to get other industry players, not just Aaron's 1 client
>>>>> perspective.
>>>>> That's all I am saying.  This has a impact on a large domain that is
>>>>> already fast moving and going through rapid change.  Let's get those other
>>>>> companies viewpoints as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> For instance, Aaron who is the manufacturer of this particular camera
>>>>> they use ?
>>>>> Knowing if it actually produces some metadata, or at least reviewing a
>>>>> spec sheet from its objects can help us quite a bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is a clump of images for some VR usage really need to be labeled as
>>>>> VirtualRealityObject ?  Or is this simply a "movie" or "set of moving
>>>>> images" ?  That's what I am trying to surface.  Aaron is not really
>>>>> providing some concrete details, and I'd like to hear from other
>>>>> competitors in the VR industry as well for broader alignment if we are
>>>>> going to start broadly.  (Hello Facebook and Google!)
>>>>>
>>>>> -Thad
>>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>